Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts with us, "Thankful." I was particularly moved by these words:
Quote:
Who I am is "ALL" of who I am. I can not pick and choose what suits me.
You are correct that Oliver Hazard Perry, of the Battle of Lake Erie, is connected with this family history. Several of us in the film are named Perry, as you know, and this is because our branch of the D'Wolf family married into the Perry family. If you are a descendant of this particular Perry, then you and I are distant relatives, and if you are descended from another Oliver Hazard Perry, he was likely a relation, as well. Please feel free to send me a private message if you'd like to discuss this further; I'd certainly be interested in knowing more about our family connection and talking further with you.
You also ask why there is no mention in the film of "Native American slaves ... or European or Chinese slaves."
There wasn't time in the film to delve into other aspects of the rich and complex history of race in the United States in a way that would do justice to the subject, and so the director chose to focus exclusively on our history of African slavery. However, this is a vital topic, and one which we discussed during filming and have taken quite seriously in our work. If you read the book written by Tom DeWolf about his experience as one of the ten family members in the film, for instance, you will see that he discusses the Native American experience in some detail and considers it an important part of the D'Wolf story and an essential parallel to the African experience in this country. (The book is
Inheriting the Trade: A Northern Family Confronts Its Legacy as the Largest Slave-Trading Dynasty in U.S. History, and you can learn more
here.)
It's worth noting, I think, that one reason we couldn't mention the enslavement of other peoples in the film, even briefly, is that the experience of each demographic group has been different, and it is not possible to do those experiences justice merely by drawing a quick parallel to the experience of another group.
For instance, you mention that the enslavement of Native Americans by European settlers was much less common. This is true, and largely for the reason you mention: that native peoples could, and did, run away successfully. As a result, the history of Native American enslavement is primarily about being shipped abroad, rather than being forced to labor in this country. Meanwhile, as you well know, forms of oppression other than slavery dominated the Native American experience after European settlement, including armed conflict and mass displacement. It would therefore be difficult to do the Native American experience justice without going into some detail.
Similarly, the history of Chinese immigrants, while terrible in the 19th century, was not chattel slavery, and to discuss it in a film about the transatlantic slave trade would require explanation. (California has recently addressed this history with an apology resolution, which I discuss
here.) The history of Europeans in this country looks even less like slavery, and it would offend many people if we were to discuss indentured servitude, for instance, as a parallel to chattel slavery without clearly distinguishing the two institutions.